WebSep 27, 2024 · Shakespeare almost certainly never read Sophocles or Euripides (let alone the much more difficult Aeschylus) in Greek, and yet he managed to write tragedies which invite comparison with those authors. He did so despite the limitations of his classical knowledge, and perhaps in part because of them. http://karagiorgos.blog-net.ch/articles-and-essays/shakespeares-classical-knowledge/
William Shakespeare Plays, Poems, Biography, Quotes,
WebIt's hard to imagine any writer of mostly shorter works as equaling Virgil, Homer, Dante and Shakespeare simply because those four seemed to be working on Big Projects throughout their whole career that are stylistically very similar to each other. I do think at isolated moments Aesychlus can be better than Homer, and Pindar better than Virgil ... WebHomer was writing not only as the Greek world was developing—onde of the first societies we give the word "civilization" to—but also as the pattern for the Western world was being set. We find early templates for ideas of … griffin fox kazoo
More reasons why the Greek poet Homer may never have existed
WebHe was certainly an accomplished Greek bard, and he probably lived in the late eighth and early seventh centuries B.C.E. Authorship is traditionally ascribed to a blind poet named Homer, and it is under this name that the works are still published. WebSep 14, 2011 · It is unlikely that William Shakespeare read a novel. The novel form had not really been developed in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, and there were not very many works around which you ... griffin frankwcpo facebook