WebDyna Technologies Pvt. Ltd v Crompton Greeves Ltd (Civil Appeal NO. 2153 of 2010) – Case analysisDifference between Inadequacy of reasons in an arbitral award and …
Dyna Technologies V Crompton Greaves PDF
WebDyna Technologies Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant ... Crompton Greaves Ltd. – Respondent Civil Appeal No. 2153 of 2010 Decided On : 18-12-2024 IMPORTANT POINTS Award should … WebThe Supreme Court in Dyna Technologies vs. Crompton Greaves 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1656 has made the following observations: 6 The requirement of a reasoned award shall be fathomed through pres-ence of three characteristics: proper, intelligible and adequate. Interference with an award shall not be made in a “casual and cavalier” manner. recipe for boiled pig feet
Challenging an Arbitral Award- Jurisdiction of Courts - MCO …
WebDec 18, 2024 · Crompton Greaves Limited (hereinafter referred to as "CGL" in short) for an aquaculture unit to be set up by such Principal, namely, DCM. CGL invited tenders for … WebJan 7, 2024 · In Dyna Technologies (P) Ltd. V. Crompton Greaves Ltd. 9, the limitations on the Court while exercising powers under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act has been highlighted thus: “24. There is no dispute that Section 34 of the Arbitration Act limits a challenge to an award only on the grounds provided therein or as interpreted by various … WebWhen Crompton Greaves Limited. found that there is some issue in the initiation of work, hence, terminated the contract. Dyna. technologies sought reimbursement for untimely ending and after this controversy was referred. to arbitration. The arbitration tribunal granted reimbursement but failed to mention any specific. recipe for boiled new potatoes