Reddit arxiv
WebApr 10, 2024 · arXiv:2304.04610 (cs) [Submitted on 10 Apr 2024] Title: ... using domain adaptive pretraining on the unlabelled dataset provided by Reddit and Gab, Joint learning, and taking different layers of transformers as input to a classification head. Our system (with team name Attention) was able to achieve a macro F1 score of 0.839 for task A, … WebMar 1, 2024 · I have never been submitting the paper to arXiv so I have a question about what kind of license or declaration I must choose to be able to submit the expanded version of the manuscript, which is soon to be accepted in Communications in Algebra at Taylor&Francis. My worry is about the Copyright agreement I will sign with Taylor&Francis.
Reddit arxiv
Did you know?
WebThe use case seems to be quite different to arxiv-sanity, though. It looks like I cannot add papers to a library, nor get personalized recommendations. It's a great resource to know which models are SOTA for which task, but not necessarily to stay up-to-date with the best research (unless you think that SOTA => best research, which isn't true). 2 WebChoose one of the social media platforms in the first week of your project such as Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, dblp, Reddit, arXiv, ResearchGate, Stackoverflow, Stackexchange and etc. Fig- ure out how you can crawl data from these websites. Some of these websites provide API for crawling the data.
WebarXiv study shows GPT-4 outperforms elite crowdworkers, helping save a team of researchers $500,000 and 20k hours. Human labeling could go by the wayside soon at this pace of improvement. artisana.ai Vote GPT-3 Language Model 0 comments Top Add a Comment More posts you may like r/GPT3 Join • 18 days ago WebA subreddit dedicated to Arxiv (http://arxiv.org/), which provides open access to e-prints in Physics, Mathematics, Computer Science, Quantitative Biology, Quantitative Finance and … The Real Housewives of Atlanta The Bachelor Sister Wives 90 Day Fiance Wife …
WebJan 30, 2024 · The question of whether peer-reviewed papers are more reliable than arXiv papers by well-known, reliable, experts is a separate question. But my point, somewhat tangential to the literal question, is that "things on the internet" are published. They are cite-able. The question of their relative reliability is subtler. WebarXiv study shows GPT-4 outperforms elite crowdworkers, helping save a team of researchers $500,000 and 20k hours. Human labeling could go by the wayside soon at this pace of improvement. This was buried deep in another report I read, but the breakdown of its performance vs. elite Surge AI taskworkers is clear.
WebHow to get published in ArXiv? My father recently completed a paper that advances analysis of odd perfect number (OPN) theory by using an old theorem to cut down on computation time. He already knows this is original research but he's not part of the academic community, so he can't self-publish into ArXiv.
Webupdated on 7 Nov : The preprint has been published on arXiv,here is the link [2211.02515] Discrete mean estimates and the Landau-Siegel zero (arxiv.org)----- He just gave a talk about that in Shandong University this morning in China I found the abstract from social media,seems the preprint will be pulished on arXiv soon . cafe sunshine baarWebAcademic papers are not going to discuss those details. They are focused on novel methods/theory, because that's what reviewers want, and they are extremely light on anything related to data acquisition, processing, etc. This is a major cause of the reproducibility crisis throughout science, as those hidden details often lead to the (often ... cmr windsorWebWe also provide the raw text data for arXiv. For Reddit, due to copyright issue. We will release a script to automatically extract the training development and test data. Inference We note that even with properly filtered Reddit dataset, sometimes our model can still generate moderately toxic/inappropriate responses. cmr wire